Harrow CCG v IPJ  EWCOP 44
Residence and care "The Court is asked to determine where AJ should live and how he should be cared for. The applicant CCG has proposed an extensive package of care at the family home, with (most of) the financial arrangements managed by a third party broker. JA's parents, who are the Second and Third Respondents, do not agree the proposals and seek the dismissal of the application.
Thanks to Will Whitaker of Bindmans (solicitor for AJ) for providing the judgment.